{"id":554,"date":"2008-07-31T08:38:47","date_gmt":"2008-07-31T12:38:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.opticality.com\/blog\/?p=554"},"modified":"2008-07-31T08:44:08","modified_gmt":"2008-07-31T12:44:08","slug":"july-2008-poker","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/opticality.com\/blog\/2008\/07\/31\/july-2008-poker\/","title":{"rendered":"July 2008 Poker"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I won&#8217;t be playing tonight, so I can safely report this month&#8217;s results now.<\/p>\n<p>Given the past few months, this one was financially <em>successful<\/em>. That said, it was extremely <em>unsatisfying<\/em> financially, while simultaneously being extremely satisfying from a <em>having a good time<\/em> perspective. I guess you can&#8217;t have it all. \ud83d\ude09<\/p>\n<p>So, the bottom line first, then a few details that I want to report just to get them off my chest (and make the above paragraph a little less opaque).<\/p>\n<p>I finished the month with a profit of $359.02. Not too shabby.<\/p>\n<p>Still, it was a financially frustrating month. If you read this space regularly, you know that I play a lot less than I used to (as in a <strong>ton<\/strong> less). That means I have much less time to play in cheaper qualifiers, so I pay a lot more to enter the bigger tournaments. That means one or two bad breaks a month and it becomes very hard to show a profit.<\/p>\n<p>This month, I lost in all four attempts at the big Sunday tourney. That was an $860 hole that I dug for myself! In addition, they now have a nice Omaha Hi\/Lo on Saturday afternoon (perfect time for me!) that costs $162 to enter. I entered that one twice as well, so that&#8217;s nearly $1,200 just to enter these six tournaments.<\/p>\n<p>In the big Sunday one, I just missed this week. I came 109th out of 944. They paid the top 100. I likely could have drifted into the money, and gotten back $300 for my $215. Psychologically, I needed to do that (or rather, could have benefited from a <em>cash<\/em>), but I knew that playing my JJ was the right thing to do. Amazingly, after a very big stack called my all-in, another guy went all-in (bigger stack than me, but less than the stack that called me!) and he only had AK. He risked his entire tournament on a draw with one person all-in, and a bigger stack calling it.<\/p>\n<p>The guy who called me had 66, so I was ahead of him, and the AK got lucky and hit, so I was out. A week ago, I came 164th out of 901, so I&#8217;m getting close, but just not getting there all the way&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>That said, in the new Saturday Omaha Hi\/Lo, I had very good success this past Saturday. I came in 4th out of 72 players. That was good enough for a $1,500 payday (bring the month back into the black). That was my single largest cash in online poker. That&#8217;s why I say it was a frustrating month, as I needed that large of a cash just to put me <em>somewhat<\/em> ahead for the month.<\/p>\n<p>My other minor frustrations were in some qualifiers. I missed winning seats to the Omaha Hi\/Lo and the Sunday tourney by one spot at least three times this month. In one, I was the overwhelming chip leader and when it came down to two people, the other person hit every flop five hands in a row, and there was nothing I could do but come second. The free seat only came to first place&#8230; On the flip side, after paying the full freight, that&#8217;s the one I made my big cash in, so I can&#8217;t complain too loudly&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, on to another month. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I won&#8217;t be playing tonight, so I can safely report this month&#8217;s results now. Given the past few months, this one was financially successful. That said, it was extremely unsatisfying financially, while simultaneously being extremely satisfying from a having a good time perspective. I guess you can&#8217;t have it all. \ud83d\ude09 So, the bottom line [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4,3,12,2,18],"tags":[1363,1368],"class_list":["post-554","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-4","category-3","category-gambling","category-2","category-poker","tag-gambling","tag-poker"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/opticality.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/554","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/opticality.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/opticality.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opticality.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opticality.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=554"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/opticality.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/554\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":558,"href":"https:\/\/opticality.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/554\/revisions\/558"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/opticality.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opticality.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opticality.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}